School+should+not+fix+its+recycling+problem

George Lefkowicz

School should not fix its recycling problem

Opinion

Recycling is ingrained into our morals as a fundamental responsibility. The triangle made of three white arrows signify everyday citizens helping the earth, but that practice might be working against the very thing we are trying to save. It seems counterintuitive, and the thought of tossing perfectly folded cardboard or squeaky clean plastics into the regular trash may even cause physical discomfort, but some evidence convincingly argues against recycling.

Accept it or not, the recycling process is a gold-plated misconception that helps people sleep at night. It would be great if a discarded water bottle and milk jug were going to a factory nearby to be transformed into a new gallon of laundry detergent or a fresh colored marker, but that process is not always a reality, at least not now.

In most cases, when the milk jug is tossed into a recycling truck, it travels potentially thousands of miles to the west coast and is shipped off to a Southeastern Asian country, which previously bought American recyclables to turn into usable goods. However, due to China’s recent change in policy, the National Sword Policy, the plastic’s journey continues as it sails in the Pacific Ocean where it is unfortunately tossed into the oceanas a last resort.

Professor Janna Jambeck, a scientistat the University of Georgia, studies oceanic plastic pollution. She co-authored a 2015 study showing that 1.3 million to 3.5 million metric tons of plastic were deposited into the ocean from Chinese coasts each year.

In the middle of the Pacific, there floats “the Great Garbage Patch” that is bigger than the state of Texas, according to a case study by the Department of Earth Sciences at Montana University. Encountering fishing nets, micro-plastics and even intact plastic bottles, ocean currents combine these plastics into floating piles of debris.

The environmental cost of shipping that waste across the globe may be worse for the environment than just throwing it into a landfill.

Also, cleaning out recycling correctly, which means cleaning them of food waste or dirt, uses hot water. This wastes hot water, which burns fossil fuels.

A massive anti-recycling campaign, though, is not necessarily the answer. Recycling could be benevolent. A better solution may someday present itself, and the world will need trained humans who are in the habit of recycling.

For now though, as horrible as it sounds, go ahead and toss that milk jug into the trash.

Comments (0)

The Southerner intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. Furthermore, we do not permit any of the following inappropriate content including: Libel or defamatory statements, any copyrighted, trademarked or intellectual property of others, the use of profanity and foul language or personal attacks. All comments are reviewed and approved by staff to ensure that they meet these standards. The Southerner does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a name and valid email address submitted that are variable. This email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments. Online comments that are found in violation of these policies will be removed as quickly as possible.
All the Southerner Online Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *